9%), crural arteries (13 1%), forearm arteries (14 3%), iliac art

9%), crural arteries (13.1%), forearm arteries (14.3%), iliac arteries (7.5%), abdominal aorta (3.3%), common femoral artery (3.3%) and popliteal artery (3.3%). Other arteries were injured less frequently. Evaluation of the data on the site of injury indicates that the superficial femoral artery was the most commonly injured in gunshot and injuries inflicted by landmines, while the brachial artery injuries inflicted by sharp objects. Superficial femoral check details artery and brachial artery were the equally frequent in blunt trauma (Figure 2). Figure 2 Anatomic distribution

of injuries. Associated injuries Associated injuries including bone, nerve and remote injury (affecting the head, chest, or abdomen) were present in 24.2% of patients (Table 2). Such were all blunt and landmine injuries, 34.21% of the gunshot injuries and only 5.35% of the injuries inflicted by sharp objects. Evaluated statistically difference was significant (X 2-test = 16.5, P = 0.001). Table 2 Complexity and mechanism of injury Injury to the artery Mode of injury Total   Blunt Gunshot Landmine Sharp N % Isolated 8 25 5 53 91 75.8 Complex 8 13 5 3 29 24.2 Total 16 38 10 56 120 100.0 X 2-test X 2 = 16.5, P = 0.001

  Clinical selleck inhibitor presentation and hemodynamic stability at the admission Bleeding was the commonest clinical presentation in all four groups AC220 supplier of injured (97/120 or 80.8%). Ischemia was less common (22/120 or 18.3%) and pulsatile hematoma was the least (1/120 or 0.8%). (Table 3). Table 3 Clinical presentation of the injured at the admission Clinical Presentation Mode of injury Total   Blunt

trauma Gunshot injury Oxaprozin Landmine injury Sharp object N % Bleeding 12 30 9 46 97 80.8 Hematoma – 1 – - 1 0.8 Ischemia 4 7 1 10 22 18.3 Total 16 38 10 56 120 100.0 The majority of the patients were admitted at the Emergency Center of the University Clinical Center hemodynamically stable (77/120 or 64.2%). Hemodynamically stable patients were especially in the group that suffered sharp vascular trauma (48/56 or 85.7%). Patients that suffered gunshot injury comprised the majority of the patient with hemodynamic instability at the admission (21/43 patients or 48.83% of all patients in shock). However, this was only a little more than half of all patients with gunshot injury (21/38 or 55.26%). In contrast 80% of patients that suffered landmine injury (8/10) where in the state of shock. In shock, at the admission, was almost every third patient that suffered blunt injury (6/16 or 37.5%) whiles the state of shock was less common for patients that suffered sharp vascular trauma (8/56 or 14.3%). Employing X2 test, we found high statistical correlation between hemodynamic stability and mode of injury (X 2-test = 16.18, P = 0.001). (Table 4).

Comments are closed.