Both cities have knowledge and experience to share. The agricultural city could adopt the building codes of the urban city and participate in the xeriscaping program. Likewise, the urban

city could monitor surface water runoff and support the installation of drip irrigation. These best practices and need and capability questions often identify a potential partnership for knowledge sharing or matching a resource and an application; further examples abound.4 Some best practices, such as drip irrigation, may not apply to urban cities, but through partnerships with nearby agricultural regions, it may be an effective way to improve regional sustainability while having an economic benefit of greater crop yields for local produce. These best practices Bucladesine datasheet and need and capability questions often identify a potential partnership for knowledge sharing or matching Obeticholic in vivo a resource and an application. Urban cities generate vast quantities of compostable food waste but lack the application for compost. Meanwhile, farmers are spending ever more on fertilizers due to rising energy costs for ammonia production, which could be offset by a supply of compost from an urban sister city. The reciprocal trade of farm waste conversion to biofuel production completes the cycle with urban transit fleets often utilizing this local renewable

fuel feedstock. The practices taken individually may benefit only one of the participating cities at the expense of the partner. A cross-sectorial analysis such as this example, which connects the energy and transportation sector with food and agriculture, demonstrates the mutual benefit from an urban–rural

partnership. The multiple choice questions in the PAIRS metric identify specific areas of reciprocity Urease and mutual benefit which could occur between two cities. When either the resource or application is missing from a single city, the score is low. When two cities match a resource and application, the combined score is higher. The normalization technique of Eq. 2 balances the www.selleckchem.com/products/MK-1775.html numeric impact of each question on the evaluation of the total PAIRS metric. Each question that uncovers a possible collaboration between two cities increases the total PAIRS metric score. PAIRS assessment criteria Assessment of public acceptability of the PAIRS metric includes psychological, demographic, and contextual independent variables. Psychological variables include commonly investigated values within Schwartz’s Value Theory, or the Value-Belief-Norm Theory (Stern 2000). The variables, listed from the most abstract to the most specific, include self-transcendence (e.g., care for others, peace, justice), enhancement (e.g., care for ego, accomplishments), biospheric (e.g., care for earth), traditionalism (e.g., respecting elders), and openness to change (e.g., curiosity, variety in life), as well as environmental concern and personal norm to protect the environment (e.g., feeling a moral environmental obligation).