It is theoretically possible that the differences in the prevalence of nonneutral CDR-H3s observed in the mature, recirculating B-cell pool reflect the changes in the complement of VH in C57BL/6 B cells when compared to BALB/c B cells. However, in previous studies of BALB/c mice, we have shown that changes in the global repertoire of CDR-H3 due to changes in DH content had no effect on VH utilization [17, 19, 21]. Thus, this possibility seemed less likely in C57BL/6 selleck products mice.

One of the first, critical somatic, clonal selective steps in repertoire development depends on the interaction between the H chain and the surrogate light chain λ5 and VpreB [22, 23]. Successful passage through this checkpoint permits Ulixertinib early pre-B fraction C cells to clonally expand and then transition to the late pre-B-cell fraction D stage at which light chain rearrangement occurs. Most of the selective influences that we had observed in developing BALB/c B lineage cells during this transition were also apparent in developing C57BL/6 B lineage cells. This included a decline in the use of VH81X, a decrease in the use of DH RF2 with a compensatory increase in the use of RF1, and a stabilization of average length and average charge

[8]. The latter two values in particular were indistinguishable between BALB/c fraction D and C57BL/6 fraction D (Fig. 4), suggesting that both mouse strains share similar preference for mechanistic regulation at the step where the interaction between the nascent heavy chain and the surrogate light chain components determine the efficiency almost of pre-BCR formation. For reasons unknown, BALB/c mice carrying the μMT mutation are leaky and can produce some B cells while C57BL/6 mice with

the same mutation are not leaky and do not produce B cells suggesting a different timing in the B-cell generation process [24]. Thus it is possible that differences in the timing of Dμ protein or pre-B-cell receptor expression between the two strains could have a downstream effect on repertoire development. A second selective step is the testing of the reactivity of the nascent IgM in fraction E. Failure at this step can lead to receptor editing, anergy, or cell death, reducing the likelihood of entry or survival of cells bearing “disfavored” IgM in the fraction F pool. Nussensweig et  al. have clearly demonstrated that this step selects against potentially pathogenic self-reactivity [25]. CDR-H3 sequences obtained from C57BL/6 fraction E cells showed a significant difference in the average hydrophobicity compared to BALB/c fraction E cells suggesting a difference in the intensity or consequences of self-antigen recognition at that stage between the two strains (Fig. 4B).