What are the effects of a paired student placement model that incorporates specifically facilitated peer-assisted learning activities, compared to a traditional teaching approach, on student performance outcomes measured buy Quizartinib by external assessors blinded to group allocation, clinical educators and student self-assessment? This trial was a prospective, randomised, crossover trial comparing two models of physiotherapy clinical undergraduate education: a traditional paired model and a peer-assisted learning paired model

(Figure 1). The trial was conducted in a tertiary metropolitan health service from June to October 2011. Participating sites included three acute hospitals, one sub-acute inpatient centre and one outpatient rehabilitation centre. Physiotherapy students from Monash University, in the third year of a four-year undergraduate http://www.selleckchem.com/products/pci-32765.html degree, were eligible for inclusion if they were allocated to clinical placements at the health service. There were no exclusion criteria. Students were randomly paired and allocated to either traditional or peer-assisted learning groups for the duration of their 5-week cardiorespiratory and neurology clinical placements. Student pairs remained

the same for both placements. Before random allocation occurred, a university staff member who was not involved in the project allocated students to placements at the participating health service, based on student preferences. Prior to the commencement of the study, participating clinical educators

were engaged in four 2-hour workshops that focused on development and facilitation of a peer-assisted learning model.21 Students attended a 2-hour tutorial on the first day of their peer-assisted learning placement, at which they were introduced to the tools and expectations of the peer-assisted learning model. Blinded assessors with experience in using the Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice were seconded from the university and other health services, and remunerated for their time. In the absence of any published operational peer-assisted learning model, the literature was mined for tools and frameworks that could be used to facilitate peer-assisted learning between student pairs. Clinical educators participating in the trial worked collaboratively TCL to develop the model, utilising an iterative process that included four workshops, culminating in consensus (process and outcomes reported in more detail elsewhere).21 The final model included a standardised series of tools that were utilised by students and educators during the peer-assisted learning clinical placements (Table 1), in addition to typical learning activities such as involvement in patient care, team meetings, tutorials and administration. The peer-assisted learning tools could be used as required, but a minimum number of applications was mandated (Table 1).