ACS Nano 2011, 5:1012 CrossRef 35 Rodrigues JNB, Gonçlves PAD, R

ACS Nano 2011, 5:1012.CrossRef 35. Rodrigues JNB, Gonçlves PAD, Rodrigues NFG, Ribeiro RM, Lopes dos Santos JMB, Peres NMR: Zigzag graphene nanoribbon edge reconstruction with Stone-Wales defects. Phys Rev B 2011, 84:155435.CrossRef 36. Karamitaheri H, Neophytou N, Pourfath M, Faez R, Kosina H: Engineering enhanced see more thermoelectric properties in zigzag graphene nanoribbons. J Appl Phys 2012, 111:054501.CrossRef 37. Song J, Liu H, Jiang H, Sun Qf, Xie XC: One-dimensional quantum channel in a graphene line defect. Phys Rev B 2012, 86:085437.CrossRef 38. Lin X,

Ni J: Half-metallicity in graphene nanoribbons with topological line defects. Phys Rev B 2011, 84:075461.CrossRef 39. Hu T, Zhou 1 J, Dong J, Kawazoe Y: Strain-induced RGFP966 solubility dmso ferromagnetism in zigzag edge graphene nanoribbon with a topological line defect. Phys Rev B 2012, 86:125420.CrossRef

40. Lü XL, Liu Z, Yao HB, Jiang LW, Gao WZ, Zheng YS: Valley polarized electronic transmission through a line defect superlattice of graphene. Phys Rev B 2012, 86:045410.CrossRef 41. Büttiker M: Four-terminal phase-coherent conductance. Phys Rev Lett 1986, 57:1761.CrossRef 42. Datta S: Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems. (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1995). 43. Jiang L, Zheng Y, Yi C, Li H, Lü T: Analytical study of edge states in a semi-infinite graphene nanoribbon. Phys Rev B 2009, 80:155454.CrossRef 44. Gong W, Han Y, Wei G: Antiresonance and bound states in the continuum in electron transport through parallel-coupled quantum-dot structures. J Phys: Condens Matt 2009, 21:175801.CrossRef Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions WJG designed the theoretical model, deduced the relevant formula, and drafted the manuscript. XYS and YW carried out the numerical DOK2 calculations. GDY participated in the analysis about the results. XHC improved the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
“Background Photovoltaic

(PV) devices, converting photon into electricity as an elegant and clean renewable energy, have attracted tremendous attentions on research and developments. Among emerging PV technologies, organic photovoltaic devices (OPV) composed of polymer matrices can be considered as promising third-generation solar cell due to its exceptional mechanical flexibility for versatile applications [1, 2]. Moreover, the solution processes of OPV enables versatile and simple processes, including dip coating, ink jet printing, screen printing, and roll-to-roll method [3, 4]. Nonetheless, OPVs suffer from the low carrier mobility issues, which hinder the performance far behind to conventional inorganic solar cells. In order to promote carrier mobility in OPV systems, inorganic semiconductor materials was introduced into OPV as electron acceptor materials, so called hybrid solar cells [5]. Hybrid solar cells utilize an advantage of intrinsically high carrier mobility from inorganic materials in organic matrices.

Comments are closed.