Without this step, the blend

monolith turns out to be drastically shrunk Blasticidin S mouse in the drying process and the pore structure is not maintained any more. It is probably because the hydrogen bonds formed between PVA and SA are not strong enough to keep the porous structure of the blend monolith; the cross-linked structure of SA with Ca2+ enhances the strength of the blend monolith with preservation of the porous morphology [15]. The blend monoliths with different mixed ratios of PVA/SA = 95/5, 90/10, and 85/15 (PVA/SA-1, PVA/SA-2, and PVA/SA-3, respectively) are successfully fabricated under the conditions described above. The mixed ratio strongly affects the formation of the blend monolith. When the ratio of PVA/SA is 70/30, the monolith is not formed due to the very high viscosity of the solution, not suitable for the phase separation. Figure 2 shows the SEM images of the PVA/SA blend monolith with different mixed ratios of PVA/SA. Similar pore structures are observed in all the blend monoliths. In the case of low ratio of SA (5%), a continuous interconnected network is well formed. With increasing the content of SA, the skeleton size increases and the pore size decreases, which affect the interconnectivity of the pore structure. This behavior is explained as follows [16]. The viscosity of the solution increases with increasing the content of SA, which leads to the higher degree of entanglement and the slower dynamics

of phase separation. Furthermore, the formation of the soluble complex between PVA and SA may also delay the phase separation process. Figure 2 SEM images of PVA/SA blend monoliths Tozasertib datasheet with different SA contents. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption triclocarban isotherm of the blend monolith (PVA/SA-1) is shown in Figure 3A. It JQ-EZ-05 cell line belongs to a type II isotherm which is formed by a macroporous absorbent. The macroporous structure is confirmed by the SEM images (Figure 2). Besides, a type H3 hysteresis loop in the P/P0 range from 0.5 to 1.0 is observed.

This hysteresis loop is caused by capillary condensation, suggesting the existence of more or less slit-like nanoscale porous structures in the present blend monolith [17]. The BET surface area of PVA/SA-1 is 89 m2/g, revealing the relatively large surface area of the obtained monolith. The pore size distribution (PSD) plot of the sample obtained by the non-local density functional theory (NLDFT) method is shown as Figure 3B. The PSD of the blend monolith is centered at 8.9 nm in the range from 5.0 to 26 nm. The data clearly confirms the nanoscale porous structure of the blend monolith. Figure 3 Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of PVA/SA blend monolith (PVA/SA-1) (A); pore size distribution by NLDFT method (B). The BET surface areas of PVA/SA-2 and PVA/SA-3 are 54 and 91 cm2/g, respectively, which are close to that of PVA/SA-1. The porosity values of PVA/SA-1, PVA/SA-2, and PVA/SA-3 calculated from the equation mentioned above are 85%, 84%, and 87%, respectively.