05 (Figure S5A). For models constrained by both lineages, 59/66 cross-validation correlations ABT-737 nmr were significant at a threshold of p < 0.005 (Figure S5B). For 33 of these

neurons, we further explored the relationship between axial and surface tuning with an additional test (Figures 6B–6D) based on one high response medial axis stimulus, one intermediate response stimulus, and one low response stimulus. Medial axis structure was preserved while surface shape was substantially altered. For some neurons, responses to a given medial axis structure remained largely consistent across surface alterations (Figure 6B). In contrast, most neurons showed strong sensitivity to surface alterations (Figures 6C and 6D). The distribution of surface sensitivity (as measured by invariance to surface selleck products changes; Figure 6E, horizontal axis) was continuous. Even for neurons with substantial surface sensitivity (toward the left of the plot), tuning for medial axis structure remained consistent (as measured by correlation between axial tuning patterns across the different surface conditions; Figure 6E, vertical axis). The full set of 59 significant composite models (constrained by both lineages) is depicted in Figure 7. In each case, the model is projected onto

one high response stimulus from each of the two medial axis lineages (left and right), with the original shaded stimuli shown below. We identified a wide array of medial axis tuning configurations, ranging from 1–12 components, and including single and double Y/T junctions. In most cases (48/59), the surface templates were at least partially associated with the same object fragments described by the medial axis templates. Surface configuration tuning also varied widely, and this was substantiated by surface models identified for the 45 neurons studied with two surface lineages (Figure S6). It is important to note that, while these tuning templates were often complex, they did not define the entire global structure of

high response stimuli. In fact, high response stimuli varied widely in global shape, both within and between stimulus lineages (Figures 1, 4, 5, 7, and 8). Thus, individual IT neurons do not appear to represent global shape, at least in the domain of novel, abstract objects Adenosine studied here. Rather, novel objects must be represented by the ensemble activity of IT neurons encoding their constituent substructures. Object shape in three dimensions is inferred from 2D image features, including shading and 2D occlusion boundary contours (Koenderink, 1984). Many IT neurons appear to encode inferred 3D object shape (Janssen et al., 2000a and Janssen et al., 2000b), rather than low-level image features, since IT shape tuning remains consistent across dramatic changes in 2D shading patterns (produced by altered lighting direction) and is strongly diminished or abolished by removing depth cues (Yamane et al., 2008).