“
“Background: Development of resistance to different classes of insecticides is a potential threat to malaria control. With the increasing coverage of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets in Tanzania, the continued monitoring of resistance in vector populations P005091 inhibitor is crucial. It may facilitate the development of novel strategies to prevent or minimize the spread of resistance. In this study, metabolic-based mechanisms conferring permethrin (pyrethroid) resistance were investigated in Anopheles arabiensis of Lower
Moshi, Kilimanjaro region of north-eastern Tanzania.
Methods: WHO susceptibility test kits were used to detect resistance to permethrin in An. arabiensis. The levels and mechanisms of permethrin resistance were determined using CDC bottle bioassays and microplate (biochemical) assays. In bottle bioassays, piperonyl butoxide (PBO) and s, s, s-tributyl
phosphorotrithioate (DEF) were used as synergists to inhibit mixed function oxidases and non-specific esterases respectively. Biochemical assays were carried out in individual mosquitoes to detect any increase in the activity of enzymes typically involved in insecticide metabolism (mixed function oxidases, alpha-and beta-esterases).
Results: Anopheles arabiensis from the study area was found to be partially resistant to permethrin, giving only 87% mortality in WHO test kits. Resistance ratios at KT(50) and KT(95) were 4.0 and 4.3 respectively. The selleck chemical permethrin resistance was partially synergized by DEF and by PBO when these were mixed with permethrin in bottle bioassays and was fully synergized when DEF and PBO were used together. The levels of oxidase and beta-esterase activity were significantly higher in An. arabiensis from Lower Moshi than in the laboratory susceptible strain. There was no difference in a-esterase activity between the two strains.
Conclusion: Elevated levels of mixed function oxidases and b-esterases play
a role in detoxification of permethrin in the resistant An. arabiensis population MLN2238 supplier of Lower Moshi.”
“Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of continuous, intermittent passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and active scrubbing of irrigants with NaviTip FX (Ultradent, South Jordan, UT) in removing smear layer.
Study design. Forty single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into 5 test groups and subjected to final irrigation with 17% EDTA followed by 2.5% NaOCl for 1 minute each using different activation methods: no activation (control), brushing with NaviTip FX, continuous PUI with irrigant delivered at pulp chamber, continuous PUI with irrigant delivered through the ultrasonic unit, and intermittent PUI. Specimens were examined under scanning electron microscope, and the data were analyzed using Friedman 2-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U tests.
Results. NaviTip FX and intermittent PUI showed significantly lower smear score than other groups at the 3 mm level (P < .05).
Conclusions.