Second, the alternating percepts in face of constant stimulation provided a critical test for the functional relevance of such synchronized networks: We investigated whether Onalespib mouse intrinsic fluctuations of synchrony predicted the subjects’ percept. On each trial, subjects (n = 24) were presented with an identical ambiguous audiovisual stimulus: two bars approached, briefly overlapped while a click sound was played, and moved apart from each other (Figure 1). As previously reported (Bushara et al., 2003 and Sekuler et al., 1997), perception of this stimulus spontaneously alternated between two distinct alternatives. For one set of trials (“bounce” trials; 52.2%), the two bars VX-809 research buy were perceived as

bouncing off each other. For the other set of trials (“pass” trials; 47.8%), the two bars were perceived as passing one another. After each stimulus presentation and a brief delay, subjects reported their percept by button press. Stimulus presentation modulated local cortical population activity in a frequency-specific fashion (Figure 2). We employed distributed source-analysis (“beamforming”) to estimate local neural population activity throughout the cortex as a function of time and frequency (see Experimental Procedures). We then quantified the change in neural activity during stimulation relative to the prestimulus

baseline. In accordance with human MEG (Donner et al., 2007, Gruber et al., 1999, Hall et al., 2005, Jensen et al., GPX6 2007, Siegel et al., 2007, Siegel et al., 2008, Tallon-Baudry et al., 1996 and Wyart and Tallon-Baudry, 2008) and invasive

animal experiments (Gray and Singer, 1989, Gregoriou et al., 2009, Henrie and Shapley, 2005 and Siegel and König, 2003), across most of visual cortex, stimulation induced a tonic increase of neural activity in the high gamma band (64–128 Hz), while activity in the theta (5–8 Hz), alpha (8–16 Hz), and beta (16–32 Hz) bands was reduced. Recovering this well-known spectral signature of visual stimulation demonstrates that EEG in combination with source-analysis allows for reconstructing cortical population signals across the entire investigated frequency range. In addition to the response in visual cortex, we found a tonic increase in the alpha band (8–16 Hz) in bilateral frontal regions consistent with the frontal eye fields (FEF). We proceeded by analyzing whether local population activity was synchronized between distant cortical regions. Our analysis approach rested on two fundaments. First, we addressed important methodological problems limiting the interpretation of measures of neural interaction derived from EEG or MEG. A key problem is to resolve whether synchrony measured between distant locations reflects truly synchronized neural activities or merely a single neural source picked up at different locations.