The effective removal of the material mainly selleck chemicals llc in the form of chips, rather than only piled up by plowing, is one of the crucial premises of the nanomachining process [17]. Therefore, such small feed is unsuitable for machining nanochannels. Similarly, the nanochannel shown in Figure 6b does not have a smooth bottom with the stage velocity (V stage) of 80 nm/s (the condition shown in Figure 2f: 0.5 V tip < V stage < V tip) and the normal load of 72.12 μN. The real pitch (Δ) is 6 nm obtained by Equation 11. Due to the real pitch (Δ) in scratching expressed in Equation

11 achieved by the V tip minus V stage, the feed of the machining can hardly reach the value as large as to ensure the cutting state playing a main role in the scratching test. Moreover, the period of the ladder shown in Figure 6b is approximately 6.260 μm which is 260 nm larger than the calculated value of L stage (6 μm). This is because the time of the AFM tip returning to the initial position (1 shown in Figure 1c) to start the next scanning cycle is about 3 s. In this period of time (t), the stage is still moving for a displacement of V stage t. Thus, the experimental period of the ladder structure has a displacement of V stage t larger than the theoretical equations devised. FGFR inhibitor Simultaneously, the displacement caused by this interval time should be

added into the length of the unmachined region. The channel in Figure 6c is machined with the stage velocity of 200 nm/s (the condition shown in Figure 3c: V tip < V stage) and the normal load of 72.12 μN. From the cross section of the channel shown in Figure 6c, it can be observed that there is almost no scratched depth of the channel. Figure 6e shows the SEM image of the scratched next region under this condition. From the SEM image, lots of larger burrs remained on both sides of the trace of

the AFM tip. In this condition, due to V stage larger than V tip, the displacement of the tip relative to the sample is in the negative direction of x axis shown in Figure 3a. Figure 7d shows the A-A cross section indicated in Figure 7b with the displacement of the tip relative to the sample in one scanning process in the negative direction of x axis. As the real pitch (Δ) in scratching is much smaller than the width of the machined nanochannel, the this website attack angle α is very small, which is closed to 0. From Figure 6e, large burrs can be observed on the right side of the nanochannel and it can be indicated that the material of the sample must be extruded by the face of the tip. Thus, plowing is the dominant mechanism in this condition and the materials cannot be effectively removed, that is, this condition may be unsuitable for the nanochannel fabrication in the present study. Figure 6 Nanochannels scratched with V stage and V tip in the same direction. ( a – c ) The AFM images of the machined nanochannel with different V stage.