1 >0 05 P54578 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 14 USP14 1 2

1 >0.05 P54578 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 14 USP14 1.2 >0.05 P04083 Annexin A1 A-I 0.9 >0.05 P08758 Annexin A5 A-V 0.8 >0.05 Table 4 WBC stimulated: for legend see Table 1 Acc-no Protein name Abbreviations Increase factor ANOVA (Pf) P43686 26S protease regulatory subunit 6B TBP-7 1.2 >0.05 P11021 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein BiP 1.1 >0.05 P13639 Elongation factor 2 EF-2 1.0 >0.05 P10809 60-kDa heat-shock protein, mitochondrial hsp60 2.7 <0.001 P08107 Heat-shock 70-kDa protein 1 hsp70 1.5 0.031 P43932 Heat-shock 70-kDa protein 4 hsp70/4 0.9 >0.05 P08238 Heat-shock protein 90 hsp90 0.9 >0.05 P52597 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein F hnRNP F 1.2 >0.05 Q14697

Neutral alpha-glucosidase AB G2 α nd nd P17987 T-complex protein 1, alpha subunit TCP-1α 1.3 0.037 P78371 T-complex Selleck BIBW2992 protein 1, beta subunit TCP-1β 1.3 0.023 P48643 T-complex protein 1, epsilon subunit TCP-1ε 1.5 <0.001 P49368 T-complex protein 1, gamma subunit TCP-1γ 1.0 >0.05 P50990 T-complex protein

1, theta subunit TCP-1τ 1.0 >0.05 P54578 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 14 USP14 1.0 >0.05 P04083 Annexin A1 A-I 1.1 >0.05 P08758 Annexin A5 A-V 1.2 >0.05 Possible mechanisms During electromagnetic exposure, we applied 5 min of BMS202 “exposure on” and 10 min of “off” on the same cell types and/or conditions, which revealed DNA breaks (Diem et al. 2005; Franzellitti et al. 2010; Schwarz et al. 2008). Interestingly, we found the same cells reactive (e.g. fibroblasts, Table 2) or nonreactive (e.g. naïve lymphocytes, Table 3), when investigating protein synthesis. Resminostat This may

suggest a common underlying mechanism between DNA breaks and increased protein synthesis in reactive cells. With this exposure regime, the temperature difference between exposed cells and control cells was less than 0.15°C, we exclude a heat-related response. Heat-induced proteome alterations detectable with our proteome profiling methodology would require temperature differences greater than 1°C. Furthermore, a temperature increase of even 1°C does not affect e.g. TCP-1 family members (Gerner et al. 2002). We conclude that the warming of the cell cultures caused by RF exposure was too low to account for the present observations. Most of the proteins found to be induced by RF-EME are chaperones, which are mediators of protein folding. Since the applied electromagnetic fields were very weak, the direct and active denaturation of existing proteins by RF-EME exposure appears unlikely to underlie the observed increased level of protein synthesis. Resonance phenomena may concentrate radiation exposure-mediated physical check details energy on hot spots and have already been suggested to cause biological effects (Belyaev 2005). Indeed, exposure to low frequency electromagnetic fields caused effects, which were reduced by noise signals (Litovitz et al. 1997), providing further support for the concept of resonance as an underlying condition. Hydrogen bonds are known to resonate with microwaves.

Comments are closed.