The color code indicates the intensity of the G+ band using an ex

The color code indicates the intensity of the G+ band using an excitation wavelength of 632.8 nm. Figure 6 Map of the D/G + peak intensity ratio of the FET. The green color around the two electrodes sketched by dashed lines represents values of 0.31 ± 0.02. In red and dark color, the intensity ratio is not defined due to the absence of Raman signal in those regions. No particular increase in defect concentration is observed at the CNT/electrode interface. Avoiding selleckchem metallic VX-689 CNTs in a transistor is of

great importance since few metallic carbon nanotubes can create a shortcut, compromising the transistor performance. Giving their clear different signature, in our Raman imaging results, metallic CNTs were not detected but only semiconducting ones [16]. It is possible that the 2% of metallic CNTs present in the original solution were burnt out during the dielectrophoresis deposition [9] or their amount is not sufficient to be detected.

Due to the metallic nature of the Pd electrodes and their roughness, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy might appear in regions where the CNT was in direct C59 wnt in vivo contact with the electrodes. However, we did not find any visible SERS effect which could be explained by the possible presence of residual photoresist that has also hidden the metallic electrode from the conductive AFM probe evidenced in CS-AFM as discussed above. The assessment of CNT diameter using Raman spectroscopy has been the subject of intense research, mainly based on the analysis of the radial breathing modes (RBM) and their frequency positions at different excitation energies using the so-called Kataura plot [16, 17, 20]. However, this method requires as many Raman excitation lines as possible using a tunable laser in order to determine resonance energies of the CNT related with optical transitions; in addition, the RBM band is very sensitive to the tube environment. For this task, the three laser lines used Casein kinase 1 in this work were not enough. However, G−/ G+ modes being in-plane vibrations are less sensitive to environmental changes [21]. Therefore, a rough estimation of the diameter (d) of CNTs deposited in the transistor was

obtained by evaluating the splitting of the G− and G+ bands following an empirical formula recently proposed by Telg et al. [12]. (1) where a 0 = 1,582 cm−1, a 1 = −27, and a 2 = 0 are parameters taken from Table 2 of reference [12] for the frequency shift ω ph of the G− observed in this work. Diameter estimations for different wavelengths are shown in Table 2. The discrepancy among estimations based on Raman data obtained with 632.8 nm excitation is a consequence of an artifact in the CCD detector for the spectral region in italics (etaloning effect). Table 2 Summary of the peak positions and intensity ratios λ (nm) G−(cm−1);d(nm) G+(cm−1) I D/I G+ 488 1,571 ± 1; 2.50 1,593 ± 1 0.28 (0.31) 514.5 1,572 ± 1; 2.75 1,593 ± 1 0.27 (0.30) 632.8 1,567 ± 5; 1.83 1,592 ± 5 0.31 (0.

Comments are closed.