It is important to identify the major (and treatable) risks for this purpose. The duration of pretransplant abstinence, HRAR score, non-compliance, personality disorder, mental illness, lack of a stable partner,

amount of consumption of alcohol at the time of assessment, reliance on family or friends learn more for post-transplant support, tobacco consumption at the time of assessment and lack of insight into alcohol were presented in various reports.[3, 9-11] Our recent report revealed that the postoperative circumstances correlated more strongly with the incidence of postoperative alcohol relapse than the pattern of alcohol consumption before transplantation.[2] Our current study showed that pretransplant abstinence shorter than 18 months was a significant indicator for harmful relapse. We did not find that HRAR score predicted recidivism Hormones antagonist or harmful relapse. Although 6 months of abstinence did not predict recidivism or harmful relapse in this study, it successfully selected patients who

recovered from liver failure without LDLT in a single-center report in Japan.[12] Although the use of 18 months of abstinence as a transplant criterion would eliminate the majority of harmful relapse patients, it would also eliminate many patients not drinking harmfully or remaining abstinent during our follow-up period. Nevertheless, patients with pretransplant sobriety shorter than 18 months may be an appropriate target group for a more intensive alcohol rehabilitation pre- and post-transplant. Another discussion is whether non-harmful relapse is acceptable or not. From a clinical point of view, it may be acceptable because the survival rate is similar to that of abstinent patients. However, it may not be acceptable from a public point of view because of the issue of organ

donation and the shortage of organs. In other words, it may be acceptable in LDLT but not in DDLT. However, because 21 of 32 patients with recidivism fell into the category of harmful relapse, any alcohol intake should be avoided after transplantation, both in LDLT and DDLT. Because there were no significant Y-27632 2HCl pretransplant data to predict recidivism in our recent report, establishment of a good alcohol rehabilitation program is the only option. The findings of this retrospective, multicenter study are limited by several factors inherent in this type of study, including variability in documentation, differences in selection criteria and data collection, and missing data. To minimize variability, we sent a standardized collection form containing 150 questions to the transplant centers. The element of time should be taken into account in the statistical analyses because subjects have differing lengths of follow up for entire post-transplant periods and period with alcohol consumption after transplantation.